McCain Mall Company Limited Partnership, Petitioner v. Pulaski County Circuit Court, Respondent

Summary

The court denied McCain Mall’s petition for a writ of certiorari because McCain Mall had already pursued an interlocutory appeal that provided an adequate remedy for its challenge to the summons. The court therefore did not decide whether the summons was defective or whether the circuit court acquired personal jurisdiction. Justice Danielson, dissenting, would have addressed the jurisdictional issue immediately because he viewed certiorari as the only adequate remedy.