Leonard Noble, Petitioner v. State of Arkansas, Respondent

Summary

The court denied Noble’s third petition seeking permission to pursue a writ of error coram nobis. It held that most allegations repeated claims previously rejected, challenged the sufficiency of the evidence, or concerned matters known or knowable at trial, while the new claim concerning a subpoenaed witness was conclusory and did not establish that the State withheld material evidence capable of preventing the conviction. No separate opinions were filed.