Lee Charles Millsap, Jr., Appellant v. State of Arkansas, Appellee

Summary

The court dismissed Millsap’s appeal from the denial of his second petition for a writ of error coram nobis because the record showed that he could not prevail. It held that his insanity claim relied on competency information known at the time of trial, his alleged Brady material consisted of facts known to him or unsupported assertions, and his coercion allegations stated ineffective-assistance claims or ordinary pressure to avoid a harsher sentence. The court also held that his motion for use of the record and extension of time was moot.