Edward Carter, Petitioner v. State of Arkansas, Respondent

Summary

The court denied Carter’s second petition for permission to pursue a writ of error coram nobis and denied his request to respond to the State’s response. It held that his allegations either repeated previously rejected sufficiency and trial-error claims, relied only on newly discovered information without showing a probable effect on the verdict, or failed to identify specific evidence suppressed by the State. The court also concluded that alleged defects in the arrest warrant were matters that could have been raised in the trial court and were not facts extrinsic to the record.