Convent Corporation v. City — Wood, J…

Summary

Justice Wood joins the conclusion that several claims were not appealable interlocutorily but dissents from reversing and remanding the denial of class certification. She reasons that Convent could not represent the proposed class because the circuit court had dismissed the claims forming the basis of that class, and that further proceedings would therefore be futile. Brill, C.J., and Goodson, J., join the dissent.