Tereginald Wallace, Petitioner v. State of Arkansas, Respondent

Summary

The court denied Wallace’s second petition to reinvest jurisdiction for a coram-nobis proceeding, treated his motion to amend as an amended petition, and denied it as well. The court held that the asserted ineffective-assistance, newly discovered evidence, third-party confession, sufficiency, due-process, equal-protection, and postconviction plea claims either were not cognizable in coram-nobis proceedings or did not establish a qualifying fundamental error. The motion for a hearing was therefore moot.