Steven Pinder, Petitioner v. State of Arkansas, Respondent

Summary

The court denied Pinder’s second petition seeking permission to pursue coram-nobis relief. It held that repeating the medical-report claim under a prosecutorial-misconduct theory did not overcome the prior diligence ruling, that unsupported allegations of knowingly false testimony did not establish fundamental error, and that the alleged licensing-date discrepancy was merely newly discovered information that did not undermine the verdict.