Rolandis Larenzo Chatmon, Appellant v. State of Arkansas, Appellee

Summary

The court affirmed Chatmon’s convictions for aggravated robbery and theft, holding that substantial evidence, including his admission to a fellow inmate and corroborating circumstantial evidence, identified him as the perpetrator. It also upheld admission of recorded jail telephone calls because a detective’s familiarity with the speakers’ voices provided sufficient authentication. The court declined to review Chatmon’s ineffective-assistance claims because his new-trial motion was deemed denied before the circuit court entered its written order.