Ken David Swindle, Appellant v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insu — Hannah, J., Concurring in Part and Dissenting…

Summary

Chief Justice Hannah concurred in denying Swindle attorney's fees but dissented from the majority's treatment of Rule 11 sanctions. He would have rejected the precedent requiring a separate sanctions motion, affirmed the circuit court's finding that Swindle filed a frivolous lawsuit, and deferred to the circuit court's discretionary decision to impose sanctions. Danielson and Wood, JJ., joined the opinion.