Duit Construction Company, Inc., Appellant v. Arkansas State Claims Commission; Arkansas General as — Hart, J…

Summary

The dissent would dismiss the appeal because the court lacked appellate jurisdiction over the circuit court's order. It reasoned that the prior appellate decision left Duit's as-applied due-process claim viable, so the dismissal of the facial due-process and equal-protection claims was not appealable without the required certification or interlocutory-appeal basis. Justice Baker, concurring, agreed with the result but would affirm on the ground that Duit pleaded only conclusory allegations of bias and had abandoned its equal-protection claim.