Deonte Edison, Appellant v. State of Arkansas, Appellee

Summary

The court affirmed Edison’s convictions and sentences, holding that the circuit court acted within its discretion in limiting cumulative questioning about the victim’s possible civil lawsuit. It further held that the challenge to questioning about a medical-record notation was not preserved because Edison failed to proffer the excluded testimony, and that any error in admitting the officer’s testimony was harmless because the same identification evidence came in without objection. No separate opinions were filed.