Danny Wright, Appellant v. State of Arkansas, Appellee

Summary

The court affirmed the denial of Danny Wright’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis. It held that his allegations concerning counsel’s advice about a possible trial sentence and parole eligibility either constituted ineffective-assistance claims that were not cognizable in coram-nobis proceedings or failed to identify an extrinsic fundamental error of fact. The court concluded that Wright had not established any basis for the extraordinary writ.