City of Siloam Springs, Arkansas, Appellant v. La-De, LLC (s/k/a De-La, LLC); Larr — Josephine-Linker'Hart, J…

Summary

The dissent argues that the attorney-fee award should be affirmed because the highway commission acted as the City's agent when it initiated the condemnation, obtained title, and incurred litigation-related liabilities on the City's behalf. In the dissent's view, the later substitution of the City did not restart the condemnation or eliminate liabilities that had already accrued. The dissent also concludes that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in awarding fees. No separate opinion was provided.