Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, Subscribing to Policy Nos. Llg035083, Llg041386, Eq6564a, E — Hart, J…

Summary

Justice Hart concurred in the result but disagreed with the majority's proposed de novo standard of review, asserting that all aspects of a motion to intervene under Rule 24 should be reviewed for abuse of discretion. She also criticized the majority for failing to address every ground relied on by the circuit court in denying intervention, although she concluded that the arguments were either addressed or subsumed by the intervention issue.