Patrick L. Sherman, Appellant v. State of Arkansas, Appellee

Summary

The court affirmed the denial of postconviction relief, holding that appellant failed to establish ineffective assistance of counsel, a double-jeopardy violation, or an invalid charging instrument. His guilty pleas waived challenges to factual guilt, and his allegations concerning suppression, prior convictions, and the sufficiency of the evidence were either unsupported, noncognizable, or meritless. The court also concluded that burglary and robbery involved different elements and could constitutionally support separate convictions.