Mister v. State

Summary

The court did not reach the merits of Mister’s ineffective-assistance claims because his appellate brief failed to comply with the requirements for an abstract and addendum. It ordered Mister to file a substituted abstract, addendum, and brief containing the missing exhibits, judgments, and transcript material necessary to decide the appeal. The court warned that failure to timely correct the deficiencies could result in affirmance of the circuit court’s judgment for noncompliance.