Marl K. Gray, Appellant v. State of Arkansas, Appellee

Summary

The court held that the trial court properly treated appellant’s mislabeled civil-rule motion as a petition to correct an illegal sentence and had authority to correct the sentence at any time. It rejected appellant’s subject-matter-jurisdiction and double-jeopardy arguments, but modified the sentence because the suspended term was required to run concurrently with the term of imprisonment. The order was affirmed as modified.