Henderson v. State

Summary

The court dismissed Henderson’s appeal from the denial of his petition because he could not prevail on either his coram nobis or habeas claims, and it denied his request for appointed counsel as moot. The coram nobis request was improperly filed in the county where Henderson was incarcerated rather than being presented to the supreme court for permission to proceed in the trial court. His habeas claims challenged trial errors, evidentiary sufficiency, and counsel effectiveness without showing facial invalidity of the judgment or lack of trial-court jurisdiction. No separate opinions were filed.