Frost v. State

Summary

The court dismissed Frost's appeal from the denial of his motion for a nunc pro tunc order because the record showed he could not prevail. The motion either sought an impermissible modification of a sentence already in execution or constituted an untimely collateral attack subject to the jurisdictional time limits for postconviction relief. The pending extensions-of-time motions were moot because Frost ultimately filed his briefs timely.