Watts v. State.‎(2)‎

Summary

The court affirmed the dismissal of Frank Watts II’s habeas petition because he failed to show that either of his convictions was facially invalid or entered without jurisdiction. His challenge to the earlier habeas proceeding in another county did not establish a basis for relief in the later proceeding, and his double-jeopardy argument was not preserved below and lacked facts showing that the judgments were void.