State of Arkansas, Appellant v. Kendrick Robinson, Appellee — Baker, J., Dissenting

Summary

Justice Baker dissented from the majority's conclusion that the State's appeal was proper under the rule governing State appeals. She would have held that the State's first argument was unpreserved and that its second argument involved settled law and mixed questions of law and fact, neither of which implicated the correct and uniform administration of the criminal law. Justice Hart joined the dissent.