Ingram v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Ingram’s capital-murder conviction and life-without-parole sentence, holding that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by removing a juror who had spoken with prospective witnesses and replacing her with an alternate. The court also declined to consider Ingram’s structural-error argument because it was not raised below, and held that he failed to demonstrate prejudice. The record did not support finding reversible error.