Deer/mt. Judea School District, Appellant v. Thomas W. Kimbrell, Ap — Corbin, J., Concurring in Part and Dissenting…

Summary

The separate opinion would dismiss the Beebe appeal as untimely because the refiling of the nonsuited claim removed the obstacle to finality, leaving the appellant responsible for promptly obtaining a final order. It also agrees that the Kimbrell appeal is moot because a statutory amendment eliminated the challenged date restriction and provided the requested relief, and it would uphold the striking of the amended complaint. The opinion concurs in part and dissents in part from the majority's disposition.