Burgie v. State

Summary

The court denied Burgie's renewed petitions to reinvest jurisdiction for coram-nobis relief. It held that his renewed claim concerning omissions from the probable-cause affidavit was an abuse of the writ, his ineffective-assistance claims were not cognizable in coram-nobis proceedings, and his claim concerning fingerprint analysis failed because no such analysis was shown to exist. The court also denied his motion for an order and dismissed his requests for disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act.