Chariell Ali Glaze v. State of Arkansas — Baker, J., Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part

Summary

Justice Baker concurred in the majority's disposition of the first two issues but disagreed with its treatment of the sentencing issue, concluding that the twenty-five-year sentence was authorized under either applicable habitual-offender statute and that Glaze's due-process challenge to the sentencing instruction was unpreserved. Baker would therefore affirm on the third issue as well. Justice Brown, concurring, agreed with the result but urged a comprehensive review of the Arkansas Criminal Code because recurring alleged conflicts between criminal statutes and emerging cybercrimes may warrant revision.