Subteach USA v. Artee Williams

Summary

Justice Danielson dissented from the court's interpretation of the unemployment-benefits statute and would have affirmed the Board of Review. He reasoned that the statute applies to employees of educational institutions, while Coleman was employed and paid by SubTeach, which contracted her instructional services to a school district. He also concluded that the statutory title and subsection (d) confirmed that the legislature did not intend subsection (a) to cover employees of private contractors. No separate opinions were provided.