Ricky Dale Smith, Appellant v. State of Arkansas, Appellee

Summary

The court affirmed Smith’s convictions for capital murder and terroristic acts, holding that evidence of two subsequent robberies and a later shooting was admissible under Rule 404(b). The subsequent-acts evidence was independently relevant because it provided context for Smith’s relationship with a witness, corroborated the alleged confession and motive, and supported the identity and intent issues; the court also declined to consider inadequately developed prejudice arguments. Hannah, C.J., dissenting, would have reversed for a new trial because the robbery evidence had minimal probative value and created substantial prejudice.