Marcie Normandin, Plaintiff/appellant v. Encanto Adventures, LLC, Defendants/appellees.

Summary

The court held that Encanto was not a manager entitled to recreational-use immunity because it lacked authority to control public access to the piñata area. Maintaining, inspecting, and grooming the area did not confer the statutory status of manager, which the court construed narrowly in light of the statute's text, purpose, and legislative history. The court reversed summary judgment for Encanto and remanded, while leaving intact the judgment for the City. No separate opinions were filed.