Joshua Stanwitz, an Individual; Andrew Clark, an Individual; Scot Mussi, an Individual; and Roy Miller, An…

Summary

The Arizona Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s judgment disqualifying the initiative from the November 2018 ballot. It held that the statute invalidating signatures collected by a registered circulator who fails to appear after proper subpoena is constitutional both facially and as applied, and that service on the building guard was valid. The court also rejected the committee’s claims of inadequate notice and delay under the applicable subpoena rules.