Troy A. Rohde v. Annette L. Rohde

Summary

The court vacated the marital-property division because the superior court used an improper method to account for alleged post-separation dissipation and clearly erred in valuing the lost home equity. On remand, the superior court must value any dissipated asset at separation and credit that value to the responsible spouse, using a supported valuation. The court affirmed the child-support order, including imputed income, arrears beginning at separation, allocation of post-separation payments, and the rejection of Troy's due-process claims.