Mark N. Wayson v. William E. Stevenson

Summary

The Alaska Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court’s judgment, holding that the 1977 easement permits commercial glacier‑tourism use, that the easement’s width may be adjusted as reasonably necessary for maintenance, that the homeowner’s “No Glacier Access” sign unreasonably interfered with the easement, that the defamation claims were barred by absolute privilege, that the Clean Water Act claim was waived, and that Stevenson was the prevailing party entitled to attorney’s fees.