Shelley Fredrickson, Appellant v. Forest J. Button, Appellee.

Summary

The Alaska Supreme Court vacated the superior court's treatment of a $300,000 Japanese government payment as income for retrospective child support and remanded for determination of its nature, affirmed the application of Rule 90.3 to calculate support, affirmed the imputation of income to Fredrickson and the refusal to impute income to Button, and vacated the award of attorney's fees to Button; Justice Bolger dissented, arguing the payment should remain treated as income.