Danny Sherrill, Appellant v. Paulita Sherrill, Appellee

Summary

The Alaska Supreme Court held that the superior court properly exercised personal jurisdiction over the nonresident husband for marital property and child support, and subject‑matter jurisdiction over child custody, affirming the division of marital property and the custody order. The court found the child‑support calculation erroneous because the trial court misapplied Alaska Civil Rule 90.3’s income ceiling and remanded that order for reconsideration. No bias on the part of the trial court was found.