Szabo v. Municipality of Anchorage

Summary

The court affirmed the denial of the Szabos' motions for relief from judgment and reconsideration. It held that their Rule 60(b)(1) request was untimely, their due process challenge did not render the judgment void under Rule 60(b)(4), their inability-to-pay argument did not establish inequity under Rule 60(b)(5), and their excessive-fines challenge could not be raised for the first time through Rule 60(b)(6). The court also held that the superior court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration.