State of Alaska and Municipality of Anchorage, Appellants v. Julie A. Schmidt, Gayle Schuh, Juli — Winfree, J…

Summary

Justice Winfree concurred in the court's analysis and decision, recognizing that binding precedent required the result. He separately questioned whether the same result could have been reached through statutory interpretation, because tenants in common may each possess the entire property and the statute and regulation may permit a full exemption when an eligible applicant owns some interest and occupies the whole residence.