James A. Madonna, Appellant v. Tamarack Air, Ltd., Appellee

Summary

The court affirmed the judgment in favor of Madonna on all challenged rulings arising from Tamarack's negligent damage to his airplane. It held that Tamarack had no contractual or bailee duty to perform post-accident repairs, and that Madonna could not recover several categories of speculative, waived, or duplicative damages. The court also upheld the statutory prejudgment-interest rate and the denial of post-trial discovery. No separate opinions were filed.