Dixie D. Dixon, Appellant v. Joshua Paul Blackwell, Appellee — Winfree, J., Concurring

Summary

Justice Winfree concurred in the court's ultimate decision because Dixon waived her argument that the offer was an offer to pay in exchange for dismissal rather than an offer permitting entry of judgment. The concurrence disagreed with the court's merits analysis, reasoning that the offer was at least ambiguous and therefore unenforceable, but concluded that the preservation failure resolved the issue and that enforcement was not plain error. There are no separate opinions.