State of Alaska, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of Corporations, Business &…

Summary

The court held that none of the Board’s findings that Wold violated the USPAP were supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. It affirmed the superior court’s reversal of seven violations, reversed the superior court’s affirmance of the remaining violation concerning the Ellis Island appraisal, and remanded for recalculation of attorney’s fees. The court also reversed the related negligence finding because it depended on the rejected USPAP violations.