Estate of Shawn Martin Mickelsen by Its Administrator, Yong Ae Mickelsen, Appellant v. North-Wen — Stowers, J…

Summary

Justice Stowers dissented from the court's decision and would have affirmed the superior court's dismissal in favor of Wendy's. The dissent would not recognize a duty requiring a business to prevent an unrelated driver from making an illegal turn off the business's premises when that conduct injures an innocent highway user. It also warns that recognizing such a duty would substantially expand business liability and litigation costs. No separate opinions are included.