Pebble Limited Partnership, Acting Through Its General Partner, Pebble Mines Corp., Petitioner v. — Stowers, J…

Summary

Justice Stowers concurred in denying Pebble's emergency petition for review because the approaching election made expedited remand and appellate review impracticable, and the asserted issues could still be litigated after the election without enduring harm. The concurrence also agreed that the superior court should address all grounds raised in a pre-election initiative challenge and enter a final appealable order. Justice Winfree, dissenting, would have granted review and required expedited consideration of the procedural and substantive challenges before the election.