Alaska Supreme Court
In the Matter of the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Tracy C.
April 22, 20112011 Alas. LEXIS 28
Summary
The court held that Tracy's otherwise moot challenge to her expired involuntary-commitment order fell within the public-interest exception because it presented a recurring statutory-interpretation issue. A commitment order must be based on the patient's condition at the commitment hearing, although the court may consider recent conduct, symptoms, and treatment history in evaluating that condition. The court affirmed because the evidence supported the finding that Tracy remained gravely disabled at the hearing. No separate opinions were filed.