Cook v. Cook

Summary

The Alaska Supreme Court affirmed enforcement of the parties’ divorce settlement agreement and the resulting monetary judgment. It held that the agreement required Michael to pay $2,000 per month beginning May 1, 2007, regardless of whether the corporations were profitable, while payments tied to income above $40,000 depended on corporate profitability. The court also held that mutual mistake, unclean hands, duress, and Civil Rule 60(b) did not justify rescission or modification. There were no separate opinions.