Ammons Properties, LLC v. Andrew William Spraggins

Summary

The court affirmed the circuit court's judgment declaring that Spraggins held an easement for ingress and egress over Ammons's property and rejecting Ammons's counterclaims. It held that the action sought recognition of an existing easement rather than condemnation of a new right-of-way, that the evidence supported an easement by necessity, and that Ammons failed to prove causation for its tort claims. No separate opinions were filed.