Roman Hoehn Fitzpatrick v. Margaret Hoehn Margaret Hoehn v. Roman Hoehn Fitzpatrick

Summary

The Alabama Supreme Court reversed the circuit court’s judgment in favor of Fitzpatrick on her intentional interference claims, entered judgment for Margaret Hoehn on those claims, affirmed the $395,000 counterclaim judgment, and dismissed Fitzpatrick’s appeal as moot regarding damages. The Court also upheld the trial court’s summary judgment on the tortious‑interference‑with‑inheritance claim and affirmed the trial court’s discretion in striking later amended complaints.