Ex Parte Frank S. Buck and Martha Jane Buck (in Re: Frank Buck and Martha Buck v. Ch Highland, LLC, and City Of…

Summary

The Court held that the appeal was not moot because the validity of the replacement ordinance remained unresolved and could affect the parties' rights. On the merits, it held that the City violated the mandatory zoning-notice requirements by adopting an ordinance containing Q conditions that had not been included in the published proposal. The Court reversed and remanded for further proceedings.