Ex Parte Jason Dean Tulley. (in Re Jason Dean Tulley v. City of Jacksonville)

Summary

Justice Shaw dissents, arguing that Ordinance No. 0-514-10 provides adequate notice of prohibited conduct and its punishment, satisfying the due‑process requirements articulated in Batchelder, and therefore would quash the writ. The dissent contends the ordinance is not facially unconstitutional and that Tulley was not convicted of a non‑existent crime.