Supreme Court of the United States
Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon
June 6, 2022596 U.S. 450
Summary
Justice Thomas delivered the opinion for all eight participating Justices, affirming the Seventh Circuit. The Court held that the relevant class of workers under §1 of the Federal Arbitration Act is determined by the work its members actually perform, not by their employer’s industry generally. Ramp supervisors who frequently load and unload cargo on airplanes traveling interstate belong to a class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce and are therefore exempt from the FAA. Workers need not personally cross state lines to qualify. The Court did not decide whether supervision of cargo loading alone would suffice. There were no separate opinions, and Justice Barrett did not participate.
Holding
- How to define the relevant class of workers under the FAA’s transportation-worker exemption.. The relevant class is defined by the work its members typically perform, rather than by the employer’s industry generally; Saxon belongs to a class of workers who frequently load and unload airplane cargo.
- Whether frequent airplane cargo loaders fall within §1’s exemption for workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.. Workers who frequently load and unload cargo on airplanes traveling interstate are exempt from the FAA under §1, even though they do not themselves cross state or international borders.
Docket 21-309
Cited authorities
- 9 U.S.C. §1
- 52 Stat. 1060
- 29 U.S.C. §201
- 9 U.S.C. §1
- 9 U.S.C. §1
- 38 Stat. 731
- 15 U.S.C. §18
Cited by
- National Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Visual Pak Co.
- Rodgers-Rouzier v. American Queen Steamboat Operating Company, LLC
- Merritt v. United States
- FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co.
- American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. United States Department of Agriculture
- National Association of Industrial Bankers v. Weiser
- Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges v. McMahon
- Danny Lopez v. Aircraft Service International, Inc.