United States v. Evelyn Sineneng-Smith — Thomas, J., Concurring

Summary

Justice Thomas concurs with the majority that the Ninth Circuit erred in finding 8 U.S.C. §1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) overbroad, and uses the opinion to critique the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine as lacking textual basis, violating facial‑challenge standards, and conflicting with traditional standing principles.