Jamar Alonzo Quarles, Petitioner v. United States

Summary

The Court held that for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, "remaining‑in burglary" occurs when a defendant forms the intent to commit a crime at any time while unlawfully remaining in a building or structure, and that Michigan’s home‑invasion statute substantially corresponds to that generic definition, so the conviction qualifies as a predicate offense. Justice Thomas, in a concurring opinion, questioned the categorical‑approach doctrine underlying ACCA’s enumerated‑offenses clause.