Supreme Court of the United States

Donald Bullcoming v. New Mexico — Sotomayor, J., Concurring

June 23, 2011180 L. Ed. 2d 610

Summary

Justice Sotomayor concurs in part, agreeing that the certified blood‑alcohol concentration report was testimonial and therefore its admission violated the Confrontation Clause. She emphasizes that the report’s primary purpose was to serve as evidence and notes the limited scope of the Court’s opinion. The concurrence does not alter the judgment of the Court.